Having only watched the first debate, this is my uninformed opinion on bumps/lack thereof
Posted by
ty97
Oct 23 '12, 13:49
|
Prior to the first debate, there a palpable sense that Romney was not very viable, and it was getting worse as time went on. The first debate made him viable, thus the big bump.
The reason we didn't see a bump after debate 2 and won't see won after debate 3 is because there was a no 'game-changer' of that sort. Obama has been viable. Romney is still viable. Thus, poll remains relatively constant.
|