ST Alpha - "can you cut and paste it ? (can't see cracked at work) -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 158

In response to "Not sure I'm buying the conclusion of, or logic behind #6. Canadians, speak up here. -- nm" by Dr.Vermin

can you cut and paste it ? (can't see cracked at work) -- nm

Posted by Moneypandie (aka Andie) Nov 5 '12, 14:07

(No message)

Responses:

What bery said. But here's the C&P - Dr.Vermin Nov 5, 14:10 7
- i actually think a 3rd real option balances, it's not so much 'us or them.' - Moneypandie Nov 5, 14:15 6
  - Yeah, observing the American's pendulum effect from the outside does not make one feel that things are being kept in check. -- nm - Beryllium Nov 5, 14:27 1
    - *nods*, i feel that with a third party, if two parties become too extremely left or right, the third option ends up looking most sane. - Moneypandie Nov 5, 14:30
  - Thank you. -- nm - Dr.Vermin Nov 5, 14:25
  - And even larger numbers of multiple parties should work just fine if they had run-off elections or multiple candidate ranking. -- nm - mara Nov 5, 14:22 1
    - It works OK in Germany and Sweden, but less well in, say, Italy and the Netherlands. -- nm - Roger More, attempting re-entry Nov 5, 14:28
  - I agree with Andie.....plus some of the best policy ideas in Canada has come from other parties....notably the NDP. -- nm - Walt_Disney Nov 5, 14:19
It basically says that a two-party system is more balanced and less extremist than a system with many parties -- nm - Beryllium Nov 5, 14:09 1
- Also, it uses the comparison of getting a group of 10 people to choose between 2 restaurants, versus 10 people to choose from 10 restaurants -- nm - Beryllium Nov 5, 14:10

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.