Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 2, 11:48
2: Dec 2, 08:21
3: Dec 1, 17:33
4: Dec 1, 11:23
5: Nov 30, 15:54
6: Nov 30, 09:41
7: Nov 29, 16:44
8: Nov 29, 08:01
9: Nov 28, 16:19
10: Nov 28, 09:42
11: Nov 27, 18:07
12: Nov 27, 12:04
13: Nov 27, 08:26
14: Nov 26, 18:06
15: Nov 26, 12:05
16: Nov 26, 08:29
17: Nov 25, 18:33
18: Nov 25, 11:12
19: Nov 25, 07:08
20: Nov 24, 13:17
Posts: 163
In response to
"
He had limited reasons to veto that becuase the Red Sox have no history of being cheapskates.
"
by
Will Hunting
Yeah, but the Marlins are getting more value back than the Sox did.
Posted by
Name Withheld By Request (aka BlueKopo)
Nov 16 '12, 08:59
At least, theorhetical value.
Responses:
No, they really aren't . They get 3 of the top 10 prospects in the Blue Jays organization but not #1.
-
Will Hunting
Nov 16, 09:04
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.