Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 29, 08:01
2: Nov 28, 16:19
3: Nov 28, 09:42
4: Nov 27, 18:07
5: Nov 27, 12:04
6: Nov 27, 08:26
7: Nov 26, 18:06
8: Nov 26, 12:05
9: Nov 26, 08:29
10: Nov 25, 18:33
11: Nov 25, 11:12
12: Nov 25, 07:08
13: Nov 24, 13:17
14: Nov 23, 18:13
15: Nov 23, 06:17
16: Nov 22, 13:24
17: Nov 22, 09:09
18: Nov 21, 22:36
19: Nov 21, 14:03
20: Nov 21, 10:18
Posts: 159
In response to
"
Is Rob not running? -- nm
"
by
ty97
We'll have to wait for his appeal to play out. -- nm
Posted by
Mop (187 lbs) (aka rburriel)
Nov 28 '12, 10:52
(No message)
Responses:
I thought he was free to run? -- nm
-
ty97
Nov 28, 10:53
5
it`s all sort of in limbo. but there seems to be a consensus he can`t run in a *by-election*. -- nm
-
Andie
Nov 28, 10:57
Given the recent clip of him falling down....let's let him walk first....then he can tackle running. -- nm
-
Will Hunting
Nov 28, 10:55
There's a movement by people with power to strictly interpret the judge's words, such that he isn't eligible to re-run until 2014 -- nm
-
Beryllium
Nov 28, 10:55
2
"the city's legal team believes the ... order prohibits [him] from running should a byelection [but] does not bar Ford from seeking re-election ..."
-
Mop (187 lbs)
Nov 28, 10:59
1
... which is in 2014, as I said -- nm
-
Beryllium
Nov 28, 11:08
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
