Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 4, 02:38
2: Dec 3, 14:19
3: Dec 3, 11:17
4: Dec 3, 07:33
5: Dec 2, 17:22
6: Dec 2, 11:48
7: Dec 2, 08:21
8: Dec 1, 17:33
9: Dec 1, 11:23
10: Nov 30, 15:54
11: Nov 30, 09:41
12: Nov 29, 16:44
13: Nov 29, 08:01
14: Nov 28, 16:19
15: Nov 28, 09:42
16: Nov 27, 18:07
17: Nov 27, 12:04
18: Nov 27, 08:26
19: Nov 26, 18:06
20: Nov 26, 12:05
Posts: 153
In response to
"
I'm not arguing that it applies in this case, but at what point does the 8th amendment kick in when it comes to accomodating dietary requests?
"
by
znufrii
He wasn't.
Posted by
spamlet
Nov 30 '12, 07:49
There was some dispute as to his weight coming in (because they didn't weigh him) but it was clear it wasn't medically necessary. He appeared to be eating the meat.
Responses:
yes, my question wasn't whether it applied in this case, but at what point would it apply. -- nm
-
znufrii
Nov 30, 07:52
1
When the jail doctor decided it was medically necessary. -- nm
-
spamlet
Nov 30, 07:53
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.