Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 4, 12:27
2: Dec 4, 09:36
3: Dec 4, 02:38
4: Dec 3, 14:19
5: Dec 3, 11:17
6: Dec 3, 07:33
7: Dec 2, 17:22
8: Dec 2, 11:48
9: Dec 2, 08:21
10: Dec 1, 17:33
11: Dec 1, 11:23
12: Nov 30, 15:54
13: Nov 30, 09:41
14: Nov 29, 16:44
15: Nov 29, 08:01
16: Nov 28, 16:19
17: Nov 28, 09:42
18: Nov 27, 18:07
19: Nov 27, 12:04
20: Nov 27, 08:26
Posts: 153
In response to
"
no, lets do SOMETHING while we wait for that other thing to happen.
"
by
groiny
I'm not a proponent of busy work if that busy work is both expensive and ineffective. -- nm
Posted by
TWuG
Dec 21 '12, 09:48
(No message)
Responses:
ok, so then we accept the reality that we could very well have more of these "incidents" while we wait. nm -- nm
-
groiny
Dec 21, 09:51
5
You accept that even if you do the supposed "solution" of armed guards, more of these incidents can happen?
-
musubi
Dec 21, 09:53
4
we can't say it would help or it would not.
-
groiny
Dec 21, 09:54
3
again, yes, we have - as Kim pointed out, there was a guard in Columbine. -- nm
-
Andie
Dec 21, 10:20
We can make educated guesses. And those educated guess suggest that it's creates more problems than fixes.
-
musubi
Dec 21, 09:55
1
I certainly don't accept this premise. Do you suggest that having armed police on the streets makes the streets less safe?
-
Dr.Vermin
Dec 21, 10:06
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
