ST Alpha - "So, The Hobbit, needs to be seen in 3D, or is regular fine? -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 155

So, The Hobbit, needs to be seen in 3D, or is regular fine? -- nm

Posted by No. 1 Stephen in the nation! (aka Sceire) Dec 27 '12, 10:50

(No message)

Responses:

Thanks everyone! Since I'm taking my dad we'll stick with the regular showing. - No. 1 Stephen in the nation! Dec 27, 11:12
From the 3D movies I've seen, only Avatar and Up were worth the premium. Avatar still looks amazing in 2D Blu-ray though. -- nm - Shaun Dec 27, 10:56 1
- Life of Pi isn't the greatest movie, substance wise, but the 3D is amazing -- nm - charlie Dec 27, 10:59
I would see it in regular. Ive heard nothing but horrible things about the 48fps. -- nm - Jovian Dec 27, 10:52
It's not especially 3D but you should still watch it in 48 FPS for the novelty. -- nm - David Dec 27, 10:51 1
- And in theory, 3D+48fps will be a less-headache-inducing experience than normal 3D. - Beryllium Dec 27, 10:59
Do NOT see in 3d if its in 48 FPS - will make you motion sick...48FPS 2D is good or 24fps 3d either or -- nm - Capstern Dec 27, 10:51 1
- that's not true. -- nm - Remlik Dec 27, 10:56
[deleted] 1
- I pretty much agree with this. nm -- nm - groiny Dec 27, 10:55
i saw it regular, it was fine. i can see how the 3D would work, but, enh, sometimes 3D actually takes me out of a movie. -- nm - Andie Dec 27, 10:50

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.