Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 29, 16:44
2: Nov 29, 08:01
3: Nov 28, 16:19
4: Nov 28, 09:42
5: Nov 27, 18:07
6: Nov 27, 12:04
7: Nov 27, 08:26
8: Nov 26, 18:06
9: Nov 26, 12:05
10: Nov 26, 08:29
11: Nov 25, 18:33
12: Nov 25, 11:12
13: Nov 25, 07:08
14: Nov 24, 13:17
15: Nov 23, 18:13
16: Nov 23, 06:17
17: Nov 22, 13:24
18: Nov 22, 09:09
19: Nov 21, 22:36
20: Nov 21, 14:03
Posts: 157
In response to
"
But how does the penalty clause exist without financial instutions? Gold coin ponzi schemes? -- nm
"
by
Max
If this guy got money from a financial institution (say investment loans or whatnot)...that would qualify imo
Posted by
Will Hunting (aka Joemetz)
Jan 23 '13, 07:58
but he ripped off individuals only.
My non-lawyer guess.
Responses:
In that case if I were the judge, I'd award the extra penalty in hopes that it would eventually kick back to the legislature for better wording. -- nm
-
Max
Jan 23, 08:02
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.