Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 2, 17:22
2: Dec 2, 11:48
3: Dec 2, 08:21
4: Dec 1, 17:33
5: Dec 1, 11:23
6: Nov 30, 15:54
7: Nov 30, 09:41
8: Nov 29, 16:44
9: Nov 29, 08:01
10: Nov 28, 16:19
11: Nov 28, 09:42
12: Nov 27, 18:07
13: Nov 27, 12:04
14: Nov 27, 08:26
15: Nov 26, 18:06
16: Nov 26, 12:05
17: Nov 26, 08:29
18: Nov 25, 18:33
19: Nov 25, 11:12
20: Nov 25, 07:08
Posts: 163
SXSW has rejected "Canyons" over "quality issues". -- (link)
Posted by
Mop (190 lbs) (aka rburriel)
Jan 23 '13, 08:58
(No message)
I believe Charlie Sheen invented the term "winning" precisely for this scenario.
(www.hollywoodreporter.com)
Responses:
The film is probably terrible, but SXSW is a very competitive festival to get accepted to.
-
ty97
Jan 23, 09:07
"A festival insider tells THR the Paul Schrader-directed thriller has "an ugliness and a deadness to it." ouch -- nm
-
amanda
Jan 23, 09:00
1
"However, if they edit out Lindsay, this critique becomes moot." -- nm
-
Will Hunting
Jan 23, 09:12
Canyons versus Mountains, next on SyFY! -- nm
-
Beaker
Jan 23, 08:59
ouch. -- nm
-
decline
Jan 23, 08:59
Is this going to end up as one of those midnight movies that plays for laughs? -- nm
-
Don Homer
Jan 23, 08:59
1
Without a doubt. -- nm
-
Mop (190 lbs)
Jan 23, 08:59
nice. -- nm
-
znufrii
Jan 23, 08:58
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
