Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 5, 10:39
2: Dec 5, 07:07
3: Dec 4, 18:10
4: Dec 4, 12:27
5: Dec 4, 09:36
6: Dec 4, 02:38
7: Dec 3, 14:19
8: Dec 3, 11:17
9: Dec 3, 07:33
10: Dec 2, 17:22
11: Dec 2, 11:48
12: Dec 2, 08:21
13: Dec 1, 17:33
14: Dec 1, 11:23
15: Nov 30, 15:54
16: Nov 30, 09:41
17: Nov 29, 16:44
18: Nov 29, 08:01
19: Nov 28, 16:19
20: Nov 28, 09:42
Posts: 151
In response to
"
I wish the author had used something besides WAR as his basis for his rankings.
"
by
Krusty
As much as WAR is not my favorite stat, this is precisely my favorite use for it. -- nm
Posted by
TFox
Jan 26 '13, 09:13
(No message)
Responses:
I believe it's a bogus, useless stat but that doesn't change the fact that the author seems to get the list right.
-
Krusty
Jan 26, 09:19
4
*nodding* -- nm
-
TFox
Jan 26, 09:24
FWIW, I'm with you on WAR. -- nm
-
David
Jan 26, 09:22
2
Most regular people seem to be but sports writers are relying on it more and more. I wish it would go away with the ESPN QB rater.
-
Krusty
Jan 26, 09:27
1
Sheffield looked like the baseball had cheated on him with Sheffields wife. Angry swings -- nm
-
Will Hunting
Jan 26, 09:44
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.