|
In response to
"My complaint is that a dollar value has to be put on that stuff to make it "valid" as a reason to regulate. I think it is a flawed way of doing things"
by
TWuG
|
The converse argument is if a piece of regulation would keep 100 people in their homes, but cost $50M to implement, it's stupid.
Posted by
TFox
Jan 28 '13, 05:51
|
Checking doesn't mean that all regulation needs to be profitable. But it does mean that you've confirmed it isn't unnecessarily burdensome.
|