Backboards: 
Posts: 151
In response to "I was figuring it would be in the article, if she was claiming anything specific." by ty97

yup. the way it's worded it comes off that it's simply being presumed the kids were exposed simply by being in his presence.

without any actual proof or indication that they were ever at any substantial risk. it's the same mindset that JackDawson's pro bono case is trying to combat.

Responses:
Post a message   top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.