Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 3, 14:19
2: Dec 3, 11:17
3: Dec 3, 07:33
4: Dec 2, 17:22
5: Dec 2, 11:48
6: Dec 2, 08:21
7: Dec 1, 17:33
8: Dec 1, 11:23
9: Nov 30, 15:54
10: Nov 30, 09:41
11: Nov 29, 16:44
12: Nov 29, 08:01
13: Nov 28, 16:19
14: Nov 28, 09:42
15: Nov 27, 18:07
16: Nov 27, 12:04
17: Nov 27, 08:26
18: Nov 26, 18:06
19: Nov 26, 12:05
20: Nov 26, 08:29
Posts: 152
This strikes me as a really good crtitique of Scalia's reasoning today. -- (link)
Posted by
mara
Feb 27 '13, 14:27
(No message)
"It was clearly constitutional under the 15th Amendment when it first passed in 1965 - something no one on the Court even contests - so it's clearly constitutional today."
(talkingpointsmemo.com)
Responses:
though, if that were true, then Brown v. BOE should not have reversed Plessy v. Ferguson -- nm
-
Max
Feb 27, 14:31
6
The criticism is of the inconsistency of Scalia's positions. He is being all kinds of hypocritical here. -- nm
-
pmb
Feb 27, 14:35
But really, isn't that the court deciding it was not constitutional when passed? Scalia is saying it was constitutional to do it at first, but isn't
-
mara
Feb 27, 14:34
4
[deleted]
3
Introduces the "Stop the Torture of Baby Pandas " Act. Vote against it! I dare ya!
-
Sen.Vermin
Feb 27, 14:48
2
Having a catchy name didn't help the DREAM Act get passed. Or the Affordable Care Act - it just got given a different name by its opponents.
-
Roger More
Feb 27, 15:09
[deleted]
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
