|
In response to
"The solution is to change the state/federal definition of marriage to be more of a corporate construct between N+1 persons."
by
Beryllium
|
Joke if you will, but I've been advocating this for a while.
Posted by
Mop (190 lbs) (aka rburriel)
Mar 26 '13, 11:38
|
The state's only involvement in relation to marriage should pertain to contractual obligations. Insurance, taxes, child support, mortgage, etc. Who's boning whom? None of the state's business. Once that's accepted, marriage will be less about genders and more about room mates and how finances are handled.
Mop
|