Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 29, 16:44
2: Nov 29, 08:01
3: Nov 28, 16:19
4: Nov 28, 09:42
5: Nov 27, 18:07
6: Nov 27, 12:04
7: Nov 27, 08:26
8: Nov 26, 18:06
9: Nov 26, 12:05
10: Nov 26, 08:29
11: Nov 25, 18:33
12: Nov 25, 11:12
13: Nov 25, 07:08
14: Nov 24, 13:17
15: Nov 23, 18:13
16: Nov 23, 06:17
17: Nov 22, 13:24
18: Nov 22, 09:09
19: Nov 21, 22:36
20: Nov 21, 14:03
Posts: 153
"[I]n the midst of a high-profile manhunt for the marathon bombers...38 more Americans � with little fanfare � died from gun violence." -- (link)
Posted by
ty97
Apr 21 '13, 13:28
(No message)
Why does America lose its head over 'terror' but ignore its daily gun deaths?
(www.guardian.co.uk)
Responses:
Bringing the class! -- nm
-
Strongbad
Apr 21, 16:03
Also within the article is a discussion of whether the city shutdown was wise or not -- nm
-
ty97
Apr 21, 13:30
Because the gun lobby has won.
-
Will Hunting
Apr 21, 13:29
20
Here's the part I legitimately don't understand anymore... If gun control supporters would just support gun control pols with time and money, the....
-
Name Withheld By Request
Apr 21, 13:56
10
how can voters in New York, Los Angeles, and Chicago vote for all the southern senators and representatives? -- nm
-
charlie
Apr 21, 14:01
9
Forgive me if I'm wrong, but doesn't some of the basic measures have fairly broad support, even in red states?
-
Name Withheld By Request
Apr 21, 14:03
8
Heidi Heitkamp voted with the 6% of her state that supported no more background checks.
-
Will Hunting
Apr 21, 14:07
7
This was my thinking...She can't trust that the 94% will step up for her because...
-
Name Withheld By Request
Apr 21, 14:25
6
no, because the NRA has made clear that if you vote against them on anything, they will spend whatever it takes to replace you
-
charlie
Apr 21, 14:27
5
There does come a point where I have trouble blasting the people willing to invest their time and money as opposed to those who can't be bothered.
-
Name Withheld By Request
Apr 21, 14:31
4
PS: If money bought elections alone, Linda McMahon would be a senator today. Ditto Meg Whitman. -- nm
-
Name Withheld By Request
Apr 21, 14:31
3
they were both terrible, rich candidates -- nm
-
charlie
Apr 21, 14:33
2
My point is that a well-funded candidate can still beat the NRA if the gun control supporters only support their candidate. -- nm
-
Name Withheld By Request
Apr 21, 14:38
1
in theory. no candidate wants to be the first one to put that theory to the test -- nm
-
charlie
Apr 21, 14:41
battle, not the war
-
charlie
Apr 21, 13:30
8
War. A guy slaughtered a classroom full of 6yr olds, and the gun lobby came out ahead. -- nm
-
Will Hunting
Apr 21, 13:34
2
lots can change if republicans continue to alienate the hispanic vote
-
stewie
Apr 21, 13:40
which just gives Dems one more wedge to use with mothers who put their children above anything else -- nm
-
charlie
Apr 21, 13:37
This feels like the war at this point. I mean, it doesn't get worse than a first grade classroom and it *still* lost. -- nm
-
ty97
Apr 21, 13:32
4
i fully expect Bloomberg to make breaking the NRA's grip on Congress his first priority when he leaves office
-
charlie
Apr 21, 13:33
3
The guy who made big drinks his pet cause in NYC? I don't care how much righteous money he puts behind it, the messenger is wrong
-
Will Hunting
Apr 21, 13:36
2
He's done a lot more than that. To say big drinks is his pet cause isn't fair.
-
Krusty
Apr 21, 13:55
he's not wrong about the drinks -- nm
-
charlie
Apr 21, 13:37
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.