ST Alpha - "Re:Parsons, there's still potential criminality for distributing child porn. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 161

Re:Parsons, there's still potential criminality for distributing child porn. -- nm

Posted by Mop on Chrome on iPad (aka rburriel) Apr 26 '13, 09:51

(No message)

Responses:

Doesn't sound like the photo in question (it was just one being circulated) would meet the definition of porn. - Name Withheld By Request Apr 26, 09:56 9
- I don't think being faceless makes it porn/notporn but it certainly does change whether they could do anything about it - zork Apr 26, 10:00
- I'd have to see what the actual definition is, but it seems like it's a for a sexual purpose. -- nm - Reagen Apr 26, 09:57 7
  - Maybe so, but again, I think that opens up a lot of kids nowadays to "distribution of child porn charges" if it's left too broad. - Name Withheld By Request Apr 26, 10:01 6
    - You'll note that a lot of kids are subject to exactly those charges these days. -- nm - Mop (190 lbs) Apr 26, 10:13 2
      - Maybe in the US, but not up here from what I understand. -- nm - Name Withheld By Request Apr 26, 10:16 1
        
        don't we have some law about their needing to be more than a 2 year age difference of something - Andie Apr 26, 10:32
    - that IM would shut down a lot of websites -- nm - zork Apr 26, 10:03 2
      - Which probably should happen anyhow. -- nm - Name Withheld By Request Apr 26, 10:12 1
        
        true -- nm - zork Apr 26, 10:16
And the argument can be made that the suicide was the result of the distribution of the photo, not the actual rape. -- nm - Mop on Chrome on iPad Apr 26, 09:54

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.