ST Alpha - "Maybe so, but again, I think that opens up a lot of kids nowadays to "distribution of child porn charges" if it's left too broad." (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 161

In response to "I'd have to see what the actual definition is, but it seems like it's a for a sexual purpose. -- nm" by Reagen

Maybe so, but again, I think that opens up a lot of kids nowadays to "distribution of child porn charges" if it's left too broad.

Posted by Name Withheld By Request (aka BlueKopo) Apr 26 '13, 10:01

There's talk about a new law that makes distribution of consensual sex recordings/pictures for the purposes of malice a crime, which would likely also cover underage.

Responses:

You'll note that a lot of kids are subject to exactly those charges these days. -- nm - Mop (190 lbs) Apr 26, 10:13 2
- Maybe in the US, but not up here from what I understand. -- nm - Name Withheld By Request Apr 26, 10:16 1
  - don't we have some law about their needing to be more than a 2 year age difference of something - Andie Apr 26, 10:32
that IM would shut down a lot of websites -- nm - zork Apr 26, 10:03 2
- Which probably should happen anyhow. -- nm - Name Withheld By Request Apr 26, 10:12 1
  - true -- nm - zork Apr 26, 10:16

Post a message top

Maybe so, but again, I think that opens up a lot of kids nowadays to "distribution of child porn charges" if it's left too broad.

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.