Vermin, the people being faulted are the ones who assault people who can't (legally) give consent.
Posted by
Reagen
Apr 26 '13, 10:45
|
apparrently I do need to reiterate that it comes down to "don't rape, assholes".
|
Responses:
-
If the evidence coming to light shows consent all around, I don't concede that there was assault. -- nm
-
Dr.Vermin
Apr 26, 10:49
18
-
I'm pretty sure he's referring to the broader statement you made, not the Parsons' case. -- nm
-
Name Withheld By Request
Apr 26, 10:49
17
-
All my statements are within context of this case. -- nm
-
Dr.Vermin
Apr 26, 10:51
-
yes. but therr also lines (age, inebriation) where we've decided consent isn't possible. -- nm
-
Reagen
Apr 26, 10:51
15
-
I have "decided" these lines don't necessarily apply when all parties are the same age and also inebriated. -- nm
-
Dr.Vermin
Apr 26, 10:53
13
-
i potentially agree on age. I vehemently do not agree with respect to inebriantion.
-
Reagen
Apr 26, 10:55
1
-
so a drunk 15 year old, any gender, can rob and bank and it's understandable? -- nm
-
Andie
Apr 26, 10:54
10
-
More to my point, it's like if a man and woman both rob a bank, they both get the same charge.
-
Dr.Vermin
Apr 26, 11:15
3
-
Trust me when I say, it is not. -- nm
-
Spawn
Apr 26, 11:09
-
Only if the bank employees are also drunk, if I'm following. -- nm
-
mara
Apr 26, 11:08
-
The bank was clearly asking for it. -- nm
-
Dr.Vermin
Apr 26, 10:56
1
-
Well, we do have fairly implicit and legal differences for crimes committed by minors in Canada. Assigning lower moral culpability. -- nm
-
Name Withheld By Request
Apr 26, 10:56
-
as long as the bank teller is drunk and 15!! -- nm
-
zork
Apr 26, 10:55
-
Teenagers sleeping with teenagers is generally one of the gimmes though. (There's an exception for it in the 16-years AoC). -- nm
-
Name Withheld By Request
Apr 26, 10:52
|