ST Alpha - "Jags not expected to take a QB at #33." (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 155

Jags not expected to take a QB at #33.

Posted by David (aka David) Apr 26 '13, 12:18

What do they see in Blaine Gabbert that the rest of us are missing?

Responses:

Honestly, maybe not much but this class is one that doesn't offer any real guarantee of "upgrade" - Will Hunting Apr 26, 12:22 9
- Exactly. Before you bail on Option A, you have to have an Option B that's better. -- nm - Jim Apr 26, 12:23 8
  - I see it differently. If you *know* Option A has bombed twice, you are doing the team a disservice by not attempting option B. -- nm - David Apr 26, 12:27 6
    - Bah, I don't waste the pick or the money on a QB this year, if I'm the Jags. - Jim Apr 26, 12:32 2
      - (this) - JaxSean Apr 26, 12:43
      - Yup -- nm - Johnny Football Apr 26, 12:42
    - But if you pick Option B, you're kinda stuck with him for 2-3 years just becuase that's the expectation.... - Will Hunting Apr 26, 12:28 2
      - A team can't be driven by that sort of fear. If Barkley can play *any*, they are 4 games better next year. -- nm - David Apr 26, 12:31 1
        
        I probably would just becuase I think I value Barkley more than most...but I could see others not thinking - Will Hunting Apr 26, 12:33
  - Note: This doesn't apply to the Jets becuase let's be honest, all the Options are better. -- nm - Will Hunting Apr 26, 12:26
Man, screw this . . . -- nm - Geno Smith Apr 26, 12:19

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.