ST Alpha - "I don't know that there would be much distinction there, they're both covering an event with the goal of reaching as broad an audience as possible." (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 155

In response to "That would explain ESPN, not the NFL Network. -- nm" by David

I don't know that there would be much distinction there, they're both covering an event with the goal of reaching as broad an audience as possible.

Posted by znufrii Apr 26 '13, 12:53

and will cater their coverage accordingly.

Responses:

ESPN is for generic sports fans. NFL Network is for NFL obsessives. -- nm - David Apr 26, 12:55
NFL Network is for the junkies. ESPN has more broad appeal. -- nm - Strongbad Apr 26, 12:55 6
- you would have had to be on drugs to watch NFLN, it was Atrocious with a capital A - Beaker Apr 26, 12:56 5
  - but I say "got vertical" and "turned his hips" instead of "ran down the field" and "changed direction" !!! -- nm - Mayock SI Apr 26, 13:03
  - I saw about 15 minutes of ESPN, that's it. -- nm - Strongbad Apr 26, 12:59 2
    - espn wasn't much better. I kept flipping back and forth whenever someone said something extra stupid... - Beaker Apr 26, 13:01 1
      - I also had the sound off. -- nm - Strongbad Apr 26, 14:07
  - I watched it, and it was fine - Spawn Apr 26, 12:57
I doubt many non NFL people watch the NFL Network. -- nm - Spawn Apr 26, 12:54

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.