Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 1, 17:33
2: Dec 1, 11:23
3: Nov 30, 15:54
4: Nov 30, 09:41
5: Nov 29, 16:44
6: Nov 29, 08:01
7: Nov 28, 16:19
8: Nov 28, 09:42
9: Nov 27, 18:07
10: Nov 27, 12:04
11: Nov 27, 08:26
12: Nov 26, 18:06
13: Nov 26, 12:05
14: Nov 26, 08:29
15: Nov 25, 18:33
16: Nov 25, 11:12
17: Nov 25, 07:08
18: Nov 24, 13:17
19: Nov 23, 18:13
20: Nov 23, 06:17
Posts: 155
In response to
"
I don't know that there would be much distinction there, they're both covering an event with the goal of reaching as broad an audience as possible.
"
by
znufrii
NFL Network is for the junkies. ESPN has more broad appeal. -- nm
Posted by
Strongbad (aka Rambler14)
Apr 26 '13, 12:55
(No message)
Responses:
you would have had to be on drugs to watch NFLN, it was Atrocious with a capital A
-
Beaker
Apr 26, 12:56
5
but I say "got vertical" and "turned his hips" instead of "ran down the field" and "changed direction" !!! -- nm
-
Mayock SI
Apr 26, 13:03
I saw about 15 minutes of ESPN, that's it. -- nm
-
Strongbad
Apr 26, 12:59
2
espn wasn't much better. I kept flipping back and forth whenever someone said something extra stupid...
-
Beaker
Apr 26, 13:01
1
I also had the sound off. -- nm
-
Strongbad
Apr 26, 14:07
I watched it, and it was fine
-
Spawn
Apr 26, 12:57
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
