Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 29, 16:44
2: Nov 29, 08:01
3: Nov 28, 16:19
4: Nov 28, 09:42
5: Nov 27, 18:07
6: Nov 27, 12:04
7: Nov 27, 08:26
8: Nov 26, 18:06
9: Nov 26, 12:05
10: Nov 26, 08:29
11: Nov 25, 18:33
12: Nov 25, 11:12
13: Nov 25, 07:08
14: Nov 24, 13:17
15: Nov 23, 18:13
16: Nov 23, 06:17
17: Nov 22, 13:24
18: Nov 22, 09:09
19: Nov 21, 22:36
20: Nov 21, 14:03
Posts: 166
"Wisdom of Crowds" author weighs in on what went wrong with Reddit's attempts to ID bombers. -- (link)
Posted by
mara
Apr 26 '13, 15:13
(No message)
"For a crowd to be smart, the people in it need to be not only diverse in their perspectives but also, relatively speaking, independent of each other."
(www.newyorker.com)
Responses:
"the Redditors faced a simple, but insuperable, obstacle when it came to identifying the Tsarnaevs, namely
-
charlie
Apr 26, 15:15
18
I can't recall - did reddit try to identify before those photos came out, aside from the brown student linking from his hs gf?
-
b.
Apr 26, 15:47
4
oh yeah, "Findthebostonbombers" was active that whole day and a half before -- nm
-
charlie
Apr 26, 15:50
3
I mean actually naming names. -- nm
-
b.
Apr 26, 15:52
2
i don't think they named the Brown student until they heard his name over the scanner when shit was going down
-
charlie
Apr 26, 15:53
1
for sure, his did come earlier as a possibility.
-
b.
Apr 26, 15:55
But that's a large part of the stupidity of their effort. They didn't have access to significant information (which any idiot would know is the case)
-
pmb
Apr 26, 15:19
11
the public was asked to post their photos, but they didn't have access to the store videos, and ..
-
zeitgeist
Apr 26, 15:29
i don't think that's necessarily a reason not to try. but it is a reason to take any potential theories or IDs as potentially unreliable
-
charlie
Apr 26, 15:25
9
I think there is value (ex.: a lot of the photographic identification was crowdsourced), but no one should look to anyone but authorities for real
-
b.
Apr 26, 15:37
1
agreeance -- nm
-
charlie
Apr 26, 15:38
From an interview I saw, it did seem like someone who set up a subreddit put some caveats in its opening post, urging people to avoid profiling
-
Max
Apr 26, 15:29
6
Right. I'm sure there could be value in it, but the ability to control so that it's productive is virtually non-existent. -- nm
-
pmb
Apr 26, 15:32
4
Well, if all they did was look for people who had a backpack in one shot and didn't in another, that might have been helpful. But singling out
-
mara
Apr 26, 15:40
3
except when you know that the bomb was in a backpack
-
charlie
Apr 26, 15:43
2
Sure, but the vast majority of people with backpacks were innocent. Looking for a guy with a dark backpack wasn't enough; they needed to also find
-
mara
Apr 26, 15:48
1
to my recollection, they did find photos with and without, including the one from the guy from FL whose friend saw his photos on fb. -- nm
-
b.
Apr 26, 15:51
the pictures with all the arrows and circles are the ones that crossed the line into Carrie from Homeland crazytown -- nm
-
charlie
Apr 26, 15:32
not as dark as some of the people in the pictures? -- nm
-
zork
Apr 26, 15:17
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.