ST Alpha - "sure they weren't, but that was the threat. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 161

In response to "incandescents were never banned. They just have to be more efficient. -- nm" by Reagen

sure they weren't, but that was the threat. -- nm

Posted by colin (aka colinski) Apr 30 '13, 12:29

(No message)

Responses:

Imagined, in people's minds. My subject line was the whole of the proposal and law. -- nm - Reagen Apr 30, 12:30 6
- you're oversimplifying. there are bans on all or just inefficient bulbs getting ready to roll out in a number of countries. it's not made up. - colin Apr 30, 12:34 5
  - GE (Among other companies) already have incandescents that meet the higher standards. -- (link) - Reagen Apr 30, 12:37 4
    - you're intentionally missing my point. -- nm - colin Apr 30, 12:39 3
      - Not really. The law doesn't say what you say it does, and the problems people are imagining are already solved. -- nm - Reagen Apr 30, 12:40 2
        
        there are many laws in many countries. are we limiting this argument to the US only? - colin Apr 30, 12:42 1
        
        I'm speaking of the US only, yes. - Reagen Apr 30, 12:46

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.