Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 1, 17:33
2: Dec 1, 11:23
3: Nov 30, 15:54
4: Nov 30, 09:41
5: Nov 29, 16:44
6: Nov 29, 08:01
7: Nov 28, 16:19
8: Nov 28, 09:42
9: Nov 27, 18:07
10: Nov 27, 12:04
11: Nov 27, 08:26
12: Nov 26, 18:06
13: Nov 26, 12:05
14: Nov 26, 08:29
15: Nov 25, 18:33
16: Nov 25, 11:12
17: Nov 25, 07:08
18: Nov 24, 13:17
19: Nov 23, 18:13
20: Nov 23, 06:17
Posts: 158
In response to
"
And if they do *not* budge, he is a Clipper. See? -- nm
"
by
Spawn
Strictly from a player standpoint the Clippers is the better job. But if you throw in owner operations the Lakers job is better -- nm
Posted by
Bacon (aka redmond)
May 21 '13, 12:55
(No message)
Responses:
the Lakers are going to be not very good for probably a not very short time -- nm
-
charlie
May 21, 12:58
I honestly can not see Phil *wanting* the Lakers now.
-
Spawn
May 21, 12:56
6
As a coach yes. As a rebuilding GM or Consultant it's a good job.
-
Bacon
May 21, 12:58
5
right. they have lots of options if they can convince kobe to take the amnesty...
-
x
May 21, 13:00
4
From what I have heard, that will not happen. -- nm
-
Spawn
May 21, 13:03
3
I think it depends on if they can keep Dwight. Lose him and you might as well blow it up -- nm
-
Bacon
May 21, 13:04
2
and that said, I think they are better off losing Dwight. I think big men with injuries only get worse over time.
-
Bacon
May 21, 13:05
1
If Phil had been coach, no way would Dwight have ever been there. -- nm
-
Spawn
May 21, 13:27
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.