Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 4, 12:27
2: Dec 4, 09:36
3: Dec 4, 02:38
4: Dec 3, 14:19
5: Dec 3, 11:17
6: Dec 3, 07:33
7: Dec 2, 17:22
8: Dec 2, 11:48
9: Dec 2, 08:21
10: Dec 1, 17:33
11: Dec 1, 11:23
12: Nov 30, 15:54
13: Nov 30, 09:41
14: Nov 29, 16:44
15: Nov 29, 08:01
16: Nov 28, 16:19
17: Nov 28, 09:42
18: Nov 27, 18:07
19: Nov 27, 12:04
20: Nov 27, 08:26
Posts: 159
In response to
"
At least we have the chance to vote them in or out. We're stuck with the court with no way of changing it.
"
by
Krusty
I don't want limits. I don't want some court pandering to voters. -- nm
Posted by
Bacon (aka redmond)
Jun 3 '13, 07:37
(No message)
Responses:
I don't see how term limits would change this one way or the other. -- nm
-
Strongbad
Jun 3, 07:39
I'm not saying we should vote for them but they shouldn't get to have the job for life.
-
Krusty
Jun 3, 07:39
yeah, that is why i dislike states that want judges to be run under a Party, i dont think that is needed
-
tRuMaN
Jun 3, 07:39
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.