Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 1, 11:23
2: Nov 30, 15:54
3: Nov 30, 09:41
4: Nov 29, 16:44
5: Nov 29, 08:01
6: Nov 28, 16:19
7: Nov 28, 09:42
8: Nov 27, 18:07
9: Nov 27, 12:04
10: Nov 27, 08:26
11: Nov 26, 18:06
12: Nov 26, 12:05
13: Nov 26, 08:29
14: Nov 25, 18:33
15: Nov 25, 11:12
16: Nov 25, 07:08
17: Nov 24, 13:17
18: Nov 23, 18:13
19: Nov 23, 06:17
20: Nov 22, 13:24
Posts: 163
In response to
"
It was not a slam dunk. In fact, mostly the opposite according to most legal scholars. -- nm
"
by
pmb
Not only did he get seated. They embraced him. OOOPS!! You don't think pictures of them all hugging won't be in election ads? -- nm
Posted by
Redmond (aka Redmond)
Feb 17 '09, 16:12
(No message)
Responses:
that wouldn't have been done if he hadn't gotten there, in part via extreme lying. -- nm
-
b!
Feb 17, 16:17
4
OMG a LIAR Appointed him, and he TOOK IT. That is all the Democrats needed to know. Really? -- nm
-
Redmond
Feb 17, 16:19
3
i don't think we said the same thing there. i was referring to burris's lying.
-
b!
Feb 17, 16:26
1
He was appointed by a liar! He took the appointment. That shows you right there he has no, zero, nadda, ethics. -- nm
-
Redmond
Feb 17, 16:29
It seems like politics in the traditional sense is dead. Stuff like this is supposed to be *leverage*, not PR stunts. -- nm
-
Beryllium
Feb 17, 16:20
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.