ST Alpha - "I would say, he was trying to prevent a crime. He was taking away the vehicle they were about to transport stolen goods in. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 157

In response to "Did the van belong to him? No. Did he take the van without permission? Yes." by Will Hunting

I would say, he was trying to prevent a crime. He was taking away the vehicle they were about to transport stolen goods in. -- nm

Posted by Redmond (aka Redmond) Feb 18 '09, 07:24

(No message)

Responses:

[deleted] 6
- However, a prosecutor could easily argue that taking the keys accomplished the same goal. -- nm - TWuG Feb 18, 07:28 5
  - I carry two sets of keys with me. Locked myself out of the car one too many times. -- nm - Redmond Feb 18, 07:30
  - [deleted] 3
    - So you could easily defend him. Doesn't mean some prosecutor somewhere wouldn't decide to take up a case against "vigilante justice." -- nm - TWuG Feb 18, 07:32 2
      - [deleted]
      - "Remember, being vigilant is not a crime. Being a "vigilante" is." -- nm - znufrii, cliqueless Feb 18, 07:33
All he needed to do was take the keys and run to safety. -- nm - TWuG Feb 18, 07:25

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.