Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 28, 16:19
2: Nov 28, 09:42
3: Nov 27, 18:07
4: Nov 27, 12:04
5: Nov 27, 08:26
6: Nov 26, 18:06
7: Nov 26, 12:05
8: Nov 26, 08:29
9: Nov 25, 18:33
10: Nov 25, 11:12
11: Nov 25, 07:08
12: Nov 24, 13:17
13: Nov 23, 18:13
14: Nov 23, 06:17
15: Nov 22, 13:24
16: Nov 22, 09:09
17: Nov 21, 22:36
18: Nov 21, 14:03
19: Nov 21, 10:18
20: Nov 21, 07:35
Posts: 153
In response to
"
WWZ was in danger of opening to $30 million six months ago. They saved it. WB pulled out all the stops for MOS yet it still died this weekend. -- nm
"
by
David
Yet (unless there's a big difference in international) Man of Steel will still turn out to be a better investment. -- nm
Posted by
Dano (aka dano)
Jun 23 '13, 12:57
(No message)
Responses:
That depends upon the domestic to foreign box office split as well as the negative costs of both.
-
David
Jun 23, 13:13
3
I'm thinking that WWZ fans will be more likely to buy the DVD than MOS fans -- nm
-
zork
Jun 23, 14:34
Advertising budgets are always hazier to me than even the production budget because you never know who paid for what with marketing partnerships.
-
Dano
Jun 23, 13:36
1
I don't think anyone (reasonable) is calling it a bomb but it is looking like another opportunity cost loss for WB. -- nm
-
David
Jun 23, 14:52
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.