Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 3, 14:19
2: Dec 3, 11:17
3: Dec 3, 07:33
4: Dec 2, 17:22
5: Dec 2, 11:48
6: Dec 2, 08:21
7: Dec 1, 17:33
8: Dec 1, 11:23
9: Nov 30, 15:54
10: Nov 30, 09:41
11: Nov 29, 16:44
12: Nov 29, 08:01
13: Nov 28, 16:19
14: Nov 28, 09:42
15: Nov 27, 18:07
16: Nov 27, 12:04
17: Nov 27, 08:26
18: Nov 26, 18:06
19: Nov 26, 12:05
20: Nov 26, 08:29
Posts: 155
ST lawyers, any major significance to SCOTUS ruling on Salinas v. Texas? -- (link)
Posted by
Mop (190 lbs) (aka rburriel)
Jun 25 '13, 10:59
(No message)
Just because you refuse to answer a question during non-custodial questioning, you're not actually asserting your Fifth Amendment rights?
(www.forbes.com)
Responses:
FWIW, I noticed the same thing on my new Nook HD.
-
spamlet
Jun 25, 11:07
[deleted]
if your client (or potential client) is in a position where they are selectively responding to a custodial interrogation, they're pretty much screwed
-
charlie
Jun 25, 11:05
5
Seriously. You go into the police station? First thing you ask is: Am I free to go? Second thing is: I want my lawyer. -- nm
-
Mop (190 lbs)
Jun 25, 11:07
4
the cops have ways of dealing with that
-
charlie
Jun 25, 11:10
3
Gee, Mr. Police Officer... you're my best friend! -- nm
-
Mop (190 lbs)
Jun 25, 11:14
1
by the time a good interrogator gets the confession from a suspect, they absolutely believe that 100% -- nm
-
charlie
Jun 25, 11:16
*hooks up suspect to the "lie detector" copy machine* -- nm
-
Don Homer
Jun 25, 11:13
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
