Backboards: 
Posts: 154
In response to "sure, but it would be someone else who did dope -- nm" by zork

Yep. He's complaining about the whole system.

Paraphrasing: "Why should I, who won worldwide fame and millions of dollars through doping, have my legacy ruined? Why not the cycllists who came in sixth or eighth that were also doping? Why not the faceless bureaucrats who looked the other way?"

I don't doubt that doping in cycling was bigger than Lance Armstrong, but his "I don't see why I should be singled out" routine is idiotic.


Post a message   top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.