In response to
"sure, but it would be someone else who did dope -- nm"
by
zork
|
Yep. He's complaining about the whole system.
Posted by
Roger More (aka Rogermore)
Jun 29 '13, 09:19
|
Paraphrasing: "Why should I, who won worldwide fame and millions of dollars through doping, have my legacy ruined? Why not the cycllists who came in sixth or eighth that were also doping? Why not the faceless bureaucrats who looked the other way?"
I don't doubt that doping in cycling was bigger than Lance Armstrong, but his "I don't see why I should be singled out" routine is idiotic.
|