ST Alpha - "I'd say no on that B requirement. I think it's pretty clear from the wording of the law that congress wanted to cover two types of cases" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 157

I'd say no on that B requirement. I think it's pretty clear from the wording of the law that congress wanted to cover two types of cases

Posted by Max Jul 2 '13, 07:51

1) A person makes a verbal oath to an official who processes the paperwork without any signature.

2) A person signs a document and presents it to an official, without verbal oath.

Responses:

[deleted] 2
- Except that I would require evidence in the form of testimony or documents which clearly confirms the lie at the time he signed the document. - Max Jul 2, 07:54 1
  - [deleted]

Post a message top

I'd say no on that B requirement. I think it's pretty clear from the wording of the law that congress wanted to cover two types of cases

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.