ST Alpha - "It's based on founding location -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 164

In response to "What? That's a NYC company w/their headquarters here. Huh? -- nm" by Krusty

It's based on founding location -- nm

Posted by ty97 Jul 3 '13, 07:41

(No message)

Responses:

Incorporated in NYC in 1902. It's a NY company. -- nm - Krusty Jul 3, 07:44 8
- True for Saks 5th Ave. But not for Saks Incorporated -- (link) - ty97 Jul 3, 07:47 7
  - They only acquired them in 1998. That's some shady s**t if that counts. Sorry. -- nm - Krusty Jul 3, 07:49 6
    - Saks itself is a NYC company that was founded here. If someone from Texas bought Nathan's would it suddenly become a brand from Texas? -- nm - Krusty Jul 3, 07:51 5
      - I agree, that's bullshit. it is 100% a NY brand. -- nm - loosilu Jul 3, 07:53
      - This not directed at you, ty, but at the list. Sorry if I came off as attacking you. -- nm - Krusty Jul 3, 07:52 3
        
        Next you are going to say Ty's pizza SUCKS! -- nm - Bacon Jul 3, 07:54 2
        
        He should come over and make some. -- nm - Krusty Jul 3, 07:55 1
        
        Word -- nm - Bacon Jul 3, 07:56

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.