ST Alpha - "True for Saks 5th Ave. But not for Saks Incorporated -- (link)" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 164

In response to "Incorporated in NYC in 1902. It's a NY company. -- nm" by Krusty

True for Saks 5th Ave. But not for Saks Incorporated -- (link)

Posted by ty97 Jul 3 '13, 07:47

(No message)

link (en.wikipedia.org)

Responses:

They only acquired them in 1998. That's some shady s**t if that counts. Sorry. -- nm - Krusty Jul 3, 07:49 6
- Saks itself is a NYC company that was founded here. If someone from Texas bought Nathan's would it suddenly become a brand from Texas? -- nm - Krusty Jul 3, 07:51 5
  - I agree, that's bullshit. it is 100% a NY brand. -- nm - loosilu Jul 3, 07:53
  - This not directed at you, ty, but at the list. Sorry if I came off as attacking you. -- nm - Krusty Jul 3, 07:52 3
    - Next you are going to say Ty's pizza SUCKS! -- nm - Bacon Jul 3, 07:54 2
      - He should come over and make some. -- nm - Krusty Jul 3, 07:55 1
        
        Word -- nm - Bacon Jul 3, 07:56

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.