Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 12, 08:55
2: Dec 11, 23:59
3: Dec 11, 14:43
4: Dec 11, 11:29
5: Dec 11, 07:59
6: Dec 10, 18:15
7: Dec 10, 12:28
8: Dec 10, 09:30
9: Dec 10, 05:59
10: Dec 9, 17:07
11: Dec 9, 13:47
12: Dec 9, 10:33
13: Dec 9, 07:33
14: Dec 8, 17:50
15: Dec 8, 10:32
16: Dec 8, 06:23
17: Dec 7, 16:52
18: Dec 7, 07:17
19: Dec 6, 14:40
20: Dec 6, 10:07
Posts: 150
NWBR, RE: Under the Dome book
Posted by
Reagen
Jul 4 '13, 15:46
1) sort of but not satisfactorily, IMO. Which is why I'm OK that they've decided to go with a different origin, apparently. "why" is not King's strong suit.
2) environmental consequences of the dome absolutely come into play.
Responses:
having not read the book, I need to ask (spoilerish?)... in regards to #2 in you IM ...
-
i'm not dead yet !
Jul 4, 16:35
2
I presume from a scene in the pilot that they've kept up with the idea that
-
Reagen
Jul 4, 17:06
Sort Of -- nm
-
Pippy
Jul 4, 16:45
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.