ST Alpha - "Houston is a better chance to win as well and there is no income tax. Win Win -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 152

In response to "If you could retire at 40 with 180 million dollars and 3 rings rather than playing for a team with a 50% winning percentage...." by ty97

Houston is a better chance to win as well and there is no income tax. Win Win -- nm

Posted by Bacon (aka redmond) Jul 5 '13, 15:48

(No message)

Responses:

But at every player can play for Houston. (also, have you been to Houston?) -- nm - ty97 Jul 5, 15:49 7
- I have not been to Houston but I hear it's the armpit of Texas. Which goes to prove my point. Live in a crappy place to make more - Bacon Jul 5, 15:50 6
  - So live the prime of your life in a place you may despise in order to make 200 million instead of 180 million? - ty97 Jul 5, 15:52 5
    - houston sounds like it has amazing, diverse food and a great arts scene....nm - x Jul 5, 16:07
    - I don't think I would despise any city with an NBA franchise. Okay, wait. Indiana Pacers. That place would be brutal. So no way on that place -- nm - Bacon Jul 5, 15:55 3
      - I am speaking theoretically, of course, of someone weight two options. - ty97 Jul 5, 15:58 2
        
        I will say this. I don't think I could live in NY so there is that. I am not a big city guy. I get claustrophobia -- nm - Bacon Jul 5, 16:02 1
        
        I am not making an argument for any specific place. - ty97 Jul 5, 16:08

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.