ST Alpha - "so, if it's offensive for ANY OTHER REASON you can see both sides, but if it's offensive for a religious reason you don't care. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 164

In response to "again, that's not the question. -- nm" by znufrii, scoreless

so, if it's offensive for ANY OTHER REASON you can see both sides, but if it's offensive for a religious reason you don't care. -- nm

Posted by Andie (aka Andie) Feb 19 '09, 07:29

(No message)

Responses:

I think the decision is more clear cut, at least. -- nm - znufrii, scoreless Feb 19, 07:31 10
- why should anyone respect *your* beliefs, then? -- nm - loosilu Feb 19, 07:32 9
  - they're not required to, by any means. -- nm - znufrii, scoreless Feb 19, 07:32 8
    - then in your world, people can't get along. -- nm - loosilu Feb 19, 07:33 7
      - when did I ever say anything like that? -- nm - znufrii, scoreless Feb 19, 07:35 6
        
        you think it's ok to not respect each other's beliefs. -- nm - loosilu Feb 19, 07:36 5
        
        only in the forced choice of a greater compassion. -- nm - znufrii, scoreless Feb 19, 07:37 4
        
        compassion should be blind to beliefs. -- nm - loosilu Feb 19, 07:38 3
        
        except when those beliefs dictate the compassion for one individual negating compassion for another. -- nm - znufrii, scoreless Feb 19, 07:40 2
        
        that's true whether the painting stays or goes. -- nm - loosilu Feb 19, 07:41 1
        
        And I simply expressed my opinion, as requested by the original question, as to where the greater compassion lies. -- nm - znufrii, scoreless Feb 19, 07:43

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.