ST Alpha - "2060 -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 151

In response to "Royal succession poll: What year will the new prince get the throne? -- nm" by zork

2060 -- nm

Posted by loosilu (aka loosilu2) Jul 22 '13, 13:14

(No message)

Responses:

more like 2080 - decline Jul 22, 13:30 13
- I suspect Camilla will kill Charles once he is on the throne - Eag Jul 22, 13:40 3
  - then she'd be powerless, that would be a rookie mistake. - Andie Jul 22, 13:44 1
    - true to the IM -- nm - zork Jul 22, 13:45
  - Camilla Wormtongue -- nm - Beryllium Jul 22, 13:41
- so you say the Queen will live to 107, Charles to 105, and William to 101+. -- nm - zork Jul 22, 13:38
- now if it was Harry, I could see him getting killed in a plane crash or something. -- nm - loosilu Jul 22, 13:37 7
  - I see Hary either never getting married or marrying a non brit -- nm - Eag Jul 22, 13:43 6
    - oh he has to get married. -- nm - loosilu Jul 22, 13:45 5
      - he's still fourth in line -- nm - zork Jul 22, 13:53 4
        
        he still has to get married. Even the gay ones get married. - loosilu Jul 22, 13:53 3
        
        I thought u were gonna say the prince of monoco -- nm - Eag Jul 22, 14:00 1
        
        I used to think he was gay until I found out he had illegitimate kids. -- nm - loosilu Jul 22, 14:01
        
        unnecessary IM -- nm - zork Jul 22, 13:56
How old are Liz and Chuck -- nm - Eag Jul 22, 13:19 16
- the important thing is how old is William -- nm - loosilu Jul 22, 13:24 15
  - Either way looks like the house of Windsor will have the longest reign in the last 600 years -- nm - Eag Jul 22, 13:28 12
    - I wonder if there has ever been this many successors at the same time, from one direct line? -- nm - loosilu Jul 22, 13:54 11
      - You been reading my mind - Eag Jul 22, 13:58
      - yes, there are four alive today and apparently there were four in Victoria's time. -- nm - Andie Jul 22, 13:57 9
        
        well, 3 straight line succession (Charles, Will, Baby X), Harry is 4th, and Charles' siblings/nephews/nieces follow, then QE2's -- nm - zork Jul 22, 14:02 4
        
        and there would have been others in succession similarly during Victoria's time. Previous to that there could have been times when as many or more str - zork Jul 22, 14:04
        
        well there have probably been times when more successors were alive, when there were larger families. -- nm - loosilu Jul 22, 14:04
        
        four generations -- nm - Andie Jul 22, 14:03 1
        
        ahh, that's what you meant. -- nm - zork Jul 22, 14:05
        
        of course, forgot her. and her descendants married into other houses of Europe. -- nm - loosilu Jul 22, 13:59 3
        
        Edward VII, George V, Edward VIII, and George VI were all born before Vicky died, however, it wasn't a straight line because of the abdication. -- nm - zork Jul 22, 14:00 2
        
        The Brits lost a colony and a king cause of us - Eag Jul 22, 14:06
        
        well, they were all direct descendants. it just wasn't the oldest. -- nm - Andie Jul 22, 14:03
  - 27 right ? -- nm - Eag Jul 22, 13:26 1
    - 31 -- nm - decline Jul 22, 13:30

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.