ST Alpha - "Does filming sequels back to back ever work out that great?...not counting LOTR which was intended from the beginning but a movie that did well, so..." (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 152

Does filming sequels back to back ever work out that great?...not counting LOTR which was intended from the beginning but a movie that did well, so...

Posted by zeitgeist Aug 1 '13, 12:58

they decide to shoot a sequel but to save money they decided to go for 2 for the price of one an a half.

matrix was a disaster, POTC crapped it self

Responses:

the 3 & 4 Musketeers in the 1970's was good, and filmed back to back -- nm - peglegpete Aug 1, 13:03 2
- that was a movie planned that way (and the stars sued because they were only paid to shoot one movie and wondered wow they sure are doing a lot of mat - zeitgeist Aug 1, 13:08 1
  - yup -- nm - peglegpete Aug 1, 13:09
Not many productions try; and most of them that do are lacking in the overall storyline to the sequels - Will Hunting Aug 1, 13:01
It's usually meant a big dropoff in box office returns for the second film released. -- nm - Inigo Aug 1, 13:01
Back to the Future 2 and 3 turned out OK. Not as good as the original, but - sequels. -- nm - Roger More Aug 1, 13:00
Back to the Future II and III were not that great either -- nm - amoxy Aug 1, 12:59 1
- 3 was better than 2 but neither were as good as 1 - eag Aug 1, 13:01

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.