In response to
"Doesn't that seem kinda like bullshit? A team like Anaheim will be crippled for years because of the Pujols contract..."
by
Jim
|
There's an easy fix here that's logical but not too logical
Posted by
Will Hunting (aka JoeMetz)
Aug 2 '13, 12:12
|
they dont pay him, but they should be held to account for what they did agree to.
They agreed to $25mil a year for him; put that one their ledger (same with Braun's money) --- they don't pay him, but they don't get the tax benefit of not paying him becuase he's a useless human.
You agreed to $200m+, you should be held to that for the tax purposes. Instead, they'll basically be saving something like $20mil a year in actual payroll and $6mil a year in the extra 33% tax hit above 189mil that $20mil would generate.
|
Responses:
|
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
|
|