Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 1, 17:33
2: Dec 1, 11:23
3: Nov 30, 15:54
4: Nov 30, 09:41
5: Nov 29, 16:44
6: Nov 29, 08:01
7: Nov 28, 16:19
8: Nov 28, 09:42
9: Nov 27, 18:07
10: Nov 27, 12:04
11: Nov 27, 08:26
12: Nov 26, 18:06
13: Nov 26, 12:05
14: Nov 26, 08:29
15: Nov 25, 18:33
16: Nov 25, 11:12
17: Nov 25, 07:08
18: Nov 24, 13:17
19: Nov 23, 18:13
20: Nov 23, 06:17
Posts: 156
In response to
"
The Yahoo system isn't that simple. Only players with the IR mark in Yahoo can be put on IR. That may or may not make a difference for how the spot
"
by
oblique
Yeah, Spawn doesn't understand what he is proposing. -- nm
Posted by
David (aka David)
Aug 5 '13, 08:55
(No message)
Responses:
What it does, is this. Without the disasters of last year.
-
Spawn
Aug 5, 08:59
1
You're just cut and pasting. And I can't take you seriously on the subject since you stubbornly refused to learn the rules last season. -- nm
-
David
Aug 5, 09:14
It's an acceptable system, it's just not nearly as flexible as perhaps we might want it to be -- nm
-
oblique
Aug 5, 08:56
4
It shouldn't be flexible. If the guy is ON IR, he can be stashed on IR in Feud.
-
Will Hunting
Aug 5, 09:19
I am voting to get rid of it entirely, but if it stays think it needs to be changed. -- nm
-
Spawn
Aug 5, 09:04
It's the same rule as other sports (with the DL spot, etc.) but the IR in the NFL is so different.
-
spamlet
Aug 5, 08:58
1
I'm gonna go all Scruffy on everything.
-
Reagen
Aug 5, 09:29
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
