Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 29, 16:44
2: Nov 29, 08:01
3: Nov 28, 16:19
4: Nov 28, 09:42
5: Nov 27, 18:07
6: Nov 27, 12:04
7: Nov 27, 08:26
8: Nov 26, 18:06
9: Nov 26, 12:05
10: Nov 26, 08:29
11: Nov 25, 18:33
12: Nov 25, 11:12
13: Nov 25, 07:08
14: Nov 24, 13:17
15: Nov 23, 18:13
16: Nov 23, 06:17
17: Nov 22, 13:24
18: Nov 22, 09:09
19: Nov 21, 22:36
20: Nov 21, 14:03
Posts: 153
Upon reading this, it does not sound different than what the administration has said all along.
Posted by
pmb (aka pmb)
Aug 9 '13, 09:38
They have the information and can go back to it if they have a reason to. It clearly states that it requires oversight to review the contents of the communications if involving US citizens. Maybe I'm missing something, but this does not sound new.
Responses:
oversight can mean any number of things. -- nm
-
znufrii
Aug 9, 09:53
4
Understood. Still not sure how it's different. I still find myself having a hard time getting as worked up about this as I probably should. I never
-
pmb
Aug 9, 10:01
2
Knowing that I'm safe from government intrusion only because I'm simply not interesting enough for the government to pay attention to is cold comfort -- nm
-
znufrii
Aug 9, 11:02
[deleted]
"Oops, we forgot that detail" being one of them -- nm
-
Beryllium
Aug 9, 09:54
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.