Backboards: 
Posts: 154

I guess I see this as less of a reach because this would be her primary phone (likely).

The law was clearly written to protect people from huge phone charges that they could not control. If that limit is no longer valid, the purpose of that section of the law should be reviewed.

(and I don't think I've ever used the words "judicial activism" in a non-ironic tense)


Responses:
  • [deleted]
Post a message   top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.