Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 3, 14:19
2: Dec 3, 11:17
3: Dec 3, 07:33
4: Dec 2, 17:22
5: Dec 2, 11:48
6: Dec 2, 08:21
7: Dec 1, 17:33
8: Dec 1, 11:23
9: Nov 30, 15:54
10: Nov 30, 09:41
11: Nov 29, 16:44
12: Nov 29, 08:01
13: Nov 28, 16:19
14: Nov 28, 09:42
15: Nov 27, 18:07
16: Nov 27, 12:04
17: Nov 27, 08:26
18: Nov 26, 18:06
19: Nov 26, 12:05
20: Nov 26, 08:29
Posts: 158
If that's the case, then why didn't he just say that when he was originally accused instead of accusing people of being on an anti-semetic witchhunt? -- nm
Posted by
volnelk
Aug 23 '13, 08:20
(No message)
Responses:
I do understand the fundamental argument of "if we want athletes to play, and these drugs get them to heal quicker so they then why are they illegal?"
-
volnelk
Aug 23, 08:22
5
I think the player, team, and doctor should submit an intend-to-use request to the league who would then give permission to proceed -- nm
-
zork
Aug 23, 08:24
4
and if it were restricted to a bona fide injury, and the player would need to be on the DL to get approved, I could see a regime like that working out -- nm
-
znufrii
Aug 23, 08:26
[deleted]
2
then they could put in place uber-strict penalties for those caught using without being approved beforehand -- nm
-
zork
Aug 23, 08:32
the union needs to have a player do this. when the league says no, they would file that the league is keeping him from being able to (come back ) work -- nm
-
zork
Aug 23, 08:29
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.