ST Alpha - "I think I'm low. It has to be more than a $100b but less than a trillion. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 166

In response to "I just realized my guess included potential values of the buildings so I'm probably crazy high. -- nm" by David

I think I'm low. It has to be more than a $100b but less than a trillion. -- nm

Posted by Krusty (aka Krustylu) Aug 27 '13, 10:58

(No message)

Responses:

You're sorta in the neighborhood (spoils) - prayformojo Aug 27, 11:00 10
- I gotta say, that seems too high... over $600 million per acre?? -- nm - Don Homer Aug 27, 11:04 3
  - Either your math is way off or mine is. -- nm - David Aug 27, 11:16
  - Trump Tower is 58 floors and takes up much less than an acre it is valued at over $310M - I don't think the numbers are that far fetched -- nm - decline Aug 27, 11:15 1
    - yeah, I wasn't factoring in highrises as much as I should have. I just guessed a flat rate of $55 million/acre. -- nm - Don Homer Aug 27, 11:19
- Right. Without the park the value of every property around it drops significantly. Still expensive but not Rockefeller expensive anymore. -- nm - Krusty Aug 27, 11:02 2
  - you're assuming that that (all of) it would be developed -- nm - zork Aug 27, 11:07 1
    - That's what we're talking about, I thought. -- nm - Krusty Aug 27, 11:08
- If that land ever came available, the basic traffic patterns of NYC would be rewritten on the fly. -- nm - David Aug 27, 11:01 2
  - The people of NYC would riot if they tried to touch one inch of that park. - Krusty Aug 27, 11:03 1
    - But as to your point, the grid would fit it perfectly. It would be real easy to develop the area once you filled in the rivers and lakes. -- nm - Krusty Aug 27, 11:05

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.