Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 4, 18:10
2: Dec 4, 12:27
3: Dec 4, 09:36
4: Dec 4, 02:38
5: Dec 3, 14:19
6: Dec 3, 11:17
7: Dec 3, 07:33
8: Dec 2, 17:22
9: Dec 2, 11:48
10: Dec 2, 08:21
11: Dec 1, 17:33
12: Dec 1, 11:23
13: Nov 30, 15:54
14: Nov 30, 09:41
15: Nov 29, 16:44
16: Nov 29, 08:01
17: Nov 28, 16:19
18: Nov 28, 09:42
19: Nov 27, 18:07
20: Nov 27, 12:04
Posts: 166
In response to
"
yes, let's make the situation more confrontational. Besides, the individual franchisees might not be able to afford it. -- nm
"
by
zork
spoilers
Posted by
znufrii
Sep 18 '13, 07:50
iinm, Starbucks stores are all corporately owned or licensed, there aren't any franchisees.
Show Spoilers
Responses:
ok, still that's a HUGE sudden expenditure to cover all their outlets. -- nm
-
zork
Sep 18, 07:52
4
They do well enough to hire one security guard per store. Plenty of business do it. -- nm
-
Krusty
Sep 18, 07:53
3
or just ... don't bring guns. People can't bring dogs in either. -- nm
-
loosilu
Sep 18, 07:55
2
Well, yeah. But the problem is people are bringing them and they seem to refuse to leave them at home despite
-
Krusty
Sep 18, 07:57
1
That's not the situation (as I understand it). Some gun owners specifically go to Starbucks, with guns, to prove a point.
-
loosilu
Sep 18, 08:04
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.