Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 29, 08:01
2: Nov 28, 16:19
3: Nov 28, 09:42
4: Nov 27, 18:07
5: Nov 27, 12:04
6: Nov 27, 08:26
7: Nov 26, 18:06
8: Nov 26, 12:05
9: Nov 26, 08:29
10: Nov 25, 18:33
11: Nov 25, 11:12
12: Nov 25, 07:08
13: Nov 24, 13:17
14: Nov 23, 18:13
15: Nov 23, 06:17
16: Nov 22, 13:24
17: Nov 22, 09:09
18: Nov 21, 22:36
19: Nov 21, 14:03
20: Nov 21, 10:18
Posts: 153
In response to
"
it shouldn't have been w/Brady throwing an INT right after that. -- nm
"
by
Diva
Yes but that runs 40 more seconds of clock. The third possession starts with 30 seconds left.
Posted by
David (aka David)
Oct 13 '13, 16:49
And NO didn't need a TD. They were about to go up 4. It was greedy and they were punished for it.
Responses:
agreeance. the play-calling was suspect. but even so the Pats got super-lucky (and the D played really well) to get the ball back after that INT. -- nm
-
Diva
Oct 13, 16:51
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.