So it sounds like the House Bill may not to be too horribly off from the Senate Bill
Posted by
ty97
Oct 15 '13, 06:41
|
per @robertcostaNRO
Part One: CR to 1/15, debt limit to 2/7
Part Two: 2 year med device suspension
Part Three: Income verification
Part Four: Obamacare for members, Cabinet members (version of Vitter language)
and per @KateNocera
House package will include some Vitter language - BUT only for members of congress. Staff would still get payment for HC.
|
Responses:
-
"They have been selling the idea they know the winning Powerball numbers and we are about to hit the jackpot."
-
Brian
Oct 15, 07:50
1 
-
frmo what I'm ready, would also stop the administration from using extraordinary measures to extend the debt ceiling.
-
znufrii
Oct 15, 07:07
1
-
@robertcostaNRO House bill moving through rules later today, vote tonight -- nm
-
ty97
Oct 15, 06:51
-
@BenjySarlin Key principle for Ds is they get something in a deal (ie reinsurance) so it wasn't a "ransom." House plan fails test. -- nm
-
ty97
Oct 15, 06:48
1
-
And to MDH below, I bet the House is totally trying to put their Bill out (maybe even first) to say "See, WE fixed this crisis!" -- nm
-
ty97
Oct 15, 06:47
1
-
@robertcostaNRO Member txts from rm: "john doing what he can. this is his only play right now. could never move on sen deal w.o. being finshd." -- nm
-
ty97
Oct 15, 06:46
-
So it sounds like it drops the reinsurance fee (which I think was a concession to Dems?) and adds partial Vitter.
-
ty97
Oct 15, 06:42
2
|