Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 2, 17:22
2: Dec 2, 11:48
3: Dec 2, 08:21
4: Dec 1, 17:33
5: Dec 1, 11:23
6: Nov 30, 15:54
7: Nov 30, 09:41
8: Nov 29, 16:44
9: Nov 29, 08:01
10: Nov 28, 16:19
11: Nov 28, 09:42
12: Nov 27, 18:07
13: Nov 27, 12:04
14: Nov 27, 08:26
15: Nov 26, 18:06
16: Nov 26, 12:05
17: Nov 26, 08:29
18: Nov 25, 18:33
19: Nov 25, 11:12
20: Nov 25, 07:08
Posts: 158
In response to
"
The problem is the ACA was sold on the fact that nothing would change for those who already had coverage.
"
by
Inigo
I'd tweak that a little. No one said premiums wouldn't change, just that you could keep your plan.
Posted by
ty97
Oct 29 '13, 11:19
We agree that latter is not true, but even if the plans *could* be kept, that premiums could double or triple still
Responses:
Here's what cracks me up about some of this. My premiums have gone up every year for like 5 years now.
-
Jim
Oct 29, 11:22
7
It's the amount of premiums going up, and the percentage they're going up that's the issue.
-
Inigo
Oct 29, 11:36
2
Mine went up ludicrously for a few years in a row a few years ago, then not at all for the past two years and minimally this year.
-
Kim Pine
Oct 29, 11:42
1
The anedotal evidence I've seen says your IM is just not true at all.
-
Inigo
Oct 29, 11:46
absolutely this. -- nm
-
ty97
Oct 29, 11:35
1
(I mean, there are real increases due to ACA for some people. But it's also convenient to blame ACA for all increases) -- nm
-
ty97
Oct 29, 11:35
Absolutely. -- nm
-
pmb
Oct 29, 11:33
Exactly this. -- nm
-
TWuG
Oct 29, 11:26
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.