Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 1, 17:33
2: Dec 1, 11:23
3: Nov 30, 15:54
4: Nov 30, 09:41
5: Nov 29, 16:44
6: Nov 29, 08:01
7: Nov 28, 16:19
8: Nov 28, 09:42
9: Nov 27, 18:07
10: Nov 27, 12:04
11: Nov 27, 08:26
12: Nov 26, 18:06
13: Nov 26, 12:05
14: Nov 26, 08:29
15: Nov 25, 18:33
16: Nov 25, 11:12
17: Nov 25, 07:08
18: Nov 24, 13:17
19: Nov 23, 18:13
20: Nov 23, 06:17
Posts: 151
In response to
"
Some people think it avoids partisan issues rather than solving them. Others believe the democrats will regret it if/when Republicans get the Senate.
"
by
David
Heck, I just prefer the Senate to work on majority rule. Want to make the rules? Become the majority. -- nm
Posted by
TWuG
Nov 22 '13, 09:36
(No message)
Responses:
I don't mind the concept of the fillibuster as it was previously used. Something that was only used for something that people were willing to lay on
-
pmb
Nov 22, 09:40
1
I'm fine with an actual "stand your ass up there and talk til you collapse" filibuster. This thing we had
-
TWuG
Nov 22, 09:42
Well, we are squarely headed in that direction since that is the way the Republicans have run the House. -- nm
-
David
Nov 22, 09:38
3
I'm fine with it operating that way. I don't like the results under GOP rule in the House, but that's just incentive for the Dems to
-
TWuG
Nov 22, 09:44
2
I am concerned by the Wonk tidbit last week that because of gerymandering, 100 democrats have to vote for every 94 republicans...
-
David
Nov 22, 09:47
1
That's true, but the pool of people eligible to vote is deeper for Dems than the GOP
-
TWuG
Nov 22, 09:52
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.