Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 11, 23:59
2: Dec 11, 14:43
3: Dec 11, 11:29
4: Dec 11, 07:59
5: Dec 10, 18:15
6: Dec 10, 12:28
7: Dec 10, 09:30
8: Dec 10, 05:59
9: Dec 9, 17:07
10: Dec 9, 13:47
11: Dec 9, 10:33
12: Dec 9, 07:33
13: Dec 8, 17:50
14: Dec 8, 10:32
15: Dec 8, 06:23
16: Dec 7, 16:52
17: Dec 7, 07:17
18: Dec 6, 14:40
19: Dec 6, 10:07
20: Dec 6, 07:32
Posts: 153
In response to
"
$158.1 million is the actual for Catching Fire, which means 6th place behind The Dark Knight. -- nm
"
by
David
read a real interesting article this morn where its considered a flop compared to the first one
Posted by
decline (aka Decline)
Nov 25 '13, 16:50
in terms of profitability because it was so much more expensive to produce.
Responses:
Only if we exclude international grosses. It will dwarf its predecessor globally. -- nm
-
David
Nov 25, 16:55
That goes without saying.
-
Spawn
Nov 25, 16:53
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.